In 2014-15, Bik examined more than 20,000 papers for image manipulation, flagging 782 of them to journals as problematic. The opening presentation by Elisabeth Bik, a science integrity consultant who won the John Maddox Prize in 2021 for her work identifying image manipulation in publications, was a bracing demonstration of how widespread research misconduct is. Research misconduct is a serious problem and (probably) getting worse Here are the four main themes that developed during the webinar. This is a question that more and more people both within and outside science are wrestling with.Īs Research Professional News editor-in-chief Sarah Richardson said at the RPN Live webinar on research integrity on 18 July, there is “growing talk of a so-called reproducibility crisis in research, and growing awareness that systemic issues within research environments-pressure to publish, insecure environments, insufficient institutional oversight, to name just a few-are jeopardising trust in the reliability of research”.īut as the ensuing discussion demonstrated, scientists care deeply about this subject they want to protect the scientific record and are readying the tools and tactics necessary to do so. If scientific results were arrived at by incorrect-or even fraudulent-methods, is our knowledge of the world really increasing? The issue of research integrity cuts to the core of scientific endeavour. RPN Live: Artificial intelligence, paper mills and more are troubling, but a fightback is afoot
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |